Why Levin & Perconti Lawyers Win: Exposing Junk Science in Birth Injury Cases

I have tried as often as I can to publish 50, 60, 70 articles over my career where I continue to assess and evaluate junk science because I feel that one of the ways that I can help other child advocates to represent brain damaged children is to explain to them and train them to understand why certain articles, why certain literature is not reliable, to point out to them what are the deficiencies, what are the biases in those articles, so that in other cases that I’m not involved in, those lawyers, should they.
Have to cross-examine or impeach experts who are willing to cite and rely on these articles that we consider to be unreliable and junk science.
It’s one thing to say they’re unreliable, but it’s another thing to have the experience and knowledge to know why and how to expose why the literature is unreliable.