Can You Sue a Hospital for Emotional Distress?
Yes, you can sue a hospital for emotional distress if it is connected to a physical injury resulting from a separate cause of action, such as medical malpractice. Most medical errors that cause emotional distress also involve severe physical injuries. However, it is possible for medical malpractice to cause psychological trauma in the absence of a physical injury.
If emotional distress arises due to medical malpractice, a hospital could potentially bear legal responsibility for it. Lawsuits strictly for the infliction of emotional distress in Illinois are only allowed in limited circumstances when you experience physical danger while witnessing another person’s death or serious injury.
In any medical malpractice claim, you have the right to include all health care providers that caused or contributed to your distress, including doctors. You will need to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that you had a doctor-patient relationship and that your injuries stemmed at least in part from the doctor’s failure to provide a reasonable standard of care.
How to Prove Emotional Distress in a Hospital Setting?
To prevail in any medical malpractice case against a hospital, you must be able to prove the following:
- You were a patient in the hospital, and hospital personnel consequently had a duty to provide you with a reasonable standard of care.
- Hospital personnel failed to provide a reasonable standard of care.
- You suffered a psychological injury you would not have suffered if the reasonable care standard had been met.
- The breach of duty, and not something else, caused your emotional distress.
Emotional injuries are more difficult to prove than physical ones because they are not visible. You will need to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that you suffered a psychological injury to the extent that it has caused a substantial and observable impact on your well-being.
A preponderance of the evidence means that your evidence must satisfy the court that your emotional distress claim is more likely true than not. This may be accomplished by presenting the court with one or more of the following types of evidence:
- A clinical diagnosis of a psychological or psychiatric disorder that stems from the incident
- The testimony of a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other qualified mental health professional
- The testimony of friends and family members who can testify to the differences they have observed before and after the incident
- Testimony by your employer about how the incident has affected your ability to work
- Documentation showing changes in your social activities or hobbies
- Documentation showing how the emotional distress has impacted your finances
The Illinois courts have established that expert testimony is not required to prove emotional distress. However, expert testimony can be helpful in emotional distress cases. Our emotional distress lawyers have access to medical and psychological experts who may be able to provide compelling testimony in court to support your claim.
When Can You Include Emotional Distress in a Hospital Medical Malpractice Claim?
In a medical malpractice case, the hospital may be liable for the actions of doctors, nurses, or other personnel who commit medical errors that lead to psychological injury. Illinois law allows damages to be awarded for emotional distress in the following circumstances:
- When you were in the zone of danger where someone else was injured
- When you also experienced a physical injury as a result of the wrongdoing
- When the act or omission that caused the emotional distress occurred in connection with another cause of action
The Illinois courts have long recognized that emotional distress may stem from physical injuries caused by medical malpractice. In these cases, damages for emotional injuries are awarded in addition to physical pain and suffering.
The Zone of Danger
The zone of danger is the immediate physical area surrounding someone experiencing a severe physical injury, in which a bystander also faces a risk of being severely injured.
In the 1983 case Rickey v. Chicago Transit Authority, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that bystanders who witness a traumatic injury or death may sue for emotional distress in the absence of a physical injury if they were in the zone of danger. This was the first time individuals in Illinois were allowed to recover damages for emotional distress in the absence of a physical injury.
Separate Causes of Action
In response to the Rickey case, the lower courts in Illinois routinely ruled against individuals pursuing damages for emotional distress who had not also been physically injured. This made it difficult for victims of medical malpractice to get justice for the psychological impacts of their injuries.
This changed in 2011 in Clark v. Children’s Memorial Hosp., when the Illinois Supreme Court established that a plaintiff could pursue damages for emotional distress as an element of damages for another wrongful act or omission.
This ruling was issued in a medical malpractice case involving the wrongful birth of a child born with permanent disabilities after a doctor failed to provide the mother with accurate genetic testing results.
This case was appealed to the state supreme court after the lower courts denied emotional damages because the mother was not in any zone of danger when the malpractice occurred. The Illinois Supreme Court overturned the lower court ruling on the following basis:
“The zone-of-danger rule applies only in cases where the plaintiff’s theory of liability is the negligent infliction of emotional distress. It does not apply where, as in a wrongful-birth case, a tort has already been committed against the plaintiffs, and they assert emotional distress as an element of damages for that tort.”
The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed its decision in another case in 2017, Cochran v. SECURITAS SEC SERVICES USA, INC., in which a corpse was delivered to the wrong family and cremated before an autopsy could be performed. Although there was no physical injury, the emotional distress occurred due to the wrongful act of denying a family the right to the decedent’s remains.
How Much Time Do I Have to File an Emotional Distress Lawsuit Against a Hospital?
Like other states, Illinois limits the time to file a medical malpractice lawsuit. This is known as a statute of limitations. The Illinois statute of limitations for medical malpractice is two years after the date of the injury.
If the injury is discovered later, you have two years from the date you discovered or reasonably should have discovered the injury to file your lawsuit. However, you cannot file a lawsuit more than four years after the date of the initial act or omission that precipitated your injury.
If you are the family member of a patient whose injury resulted in death, you have one year from the date of death to file a lawsuit or until the date on which the statute of limitations would have expired for the deceased had they lived, whichever is later.
There are some exceptions to the statute of limitations, including cases involving children and people with disabilities who cannot file. It’s important to contact a medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible so they can help you determine how the statute of limitations applies to your case.
How Levin & Perconti Can Assist You in Suing a Hospital for Emotional Distress?
You may be entitled to substantial compensation if you have experienced emotional distress from medical malpractice in a hospital. Our medical malpractice lawyers at Levin & Perconti understand the emotional toll medical injuries can have on an individual and a family, and we are dedicated to pursuing justice. Contact us today for a free consultation.
What Is Emotional Distress?
Emotional distress in a medical malpractice case is psychological trauma that damages your daily life. It is also known as mental anguish. Symptoms of mental anguish may include the following:
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Severe anxiety
- Deep depression
- An inability to function at work
- Changes in your ability to maintain relationships
- Suicidal thoughts
- The development of phobias
- A loss of your financial or social status
Emotional distress may stem from various medical injuries, including chronic pain, new disabilities, wrongful death, and birth injuries.
How Is Compensation for Emotional Distress Determined in Illinois?
Compensation for damages in Illinois involves consideration of the total economic and non-economic damages in a case. The economic damages are the actual monetary losses that can be proven through documentation. Non-economic damages are intangible losses, such as pain, suffering, and emotional distress.
The Illinois courts have disagreed about whether emotional distress should be included in pain and suffering damages or should be separate. In recent cases, the courts have allowed emotional distress to be awarded separately.
Not only were they so professional but also so caring and thoughtful. It was very difficult going over the facts in our mother's case but they were so compassionate and understanding and allowed us to be with them every step of the way. We were able to sit in on the depositions and we were really able to see how hard they worked on our behalf.