In the early morning hours of November 4, 2020, John Bradley Barnes was driving southbound on I-55 in Montgomery County when a commercial truck pulled onto the interstate from the shoulder at 5-10 miles per hour on a 70+ miles per hour highway. Our client was unable to react in time, rear-ended the truck, was crushed by the impact, and died. The crash was unavoidable and unsurvivable.
The Crash
Our client was traveling southbound on I-55 when a truck pulling double trailers, which had pulled onto the shoulder temporarily, began slowly re-entering the right travel lane. Barnes had mere seconds to react before the moment of impact. Our attorneys argued that Barnes was presented with an unavoidable crash scenario.
The front passenger side of Barnes’ car struck the rear driver side of the second trailer. The impact caused catastrophic front-end damage to his vehicle and resulted in his death.
What the Defense Argued
The defense argued our client had ample opportunity to brake or steer clear. They pointed to the absence of tire marks at the scene and Barnes’ vehicle data as evidence that Barnes made no attempt to brake or change lanes.
The Trial
Our trial team, of senior associates, Gabriel Aprati and Nicholas Emerson, demonstrated that Barnes was an attentive driver, and that most attentive drivers would not have been able to avoid a collision.
On the question of perception, they demonstrated a fundamental truth about human limitations: while Barnes could see the truck’s taillights, detecting a speed differential from a distance at highway speed is not something the human eye can reliably do. He would not have recognized the danger until he was already too close to avoid it.
“John Barnes was doing exactly what every driver on that highway was doing: traveling at speed, in his lane, with no reason to expect danger. A truck re-entering from the shoulder at 5-10 miles per hour on a 70-mile-per-hour interstate is not a hazard you can anticipate. It’s one you never see coming.”
Gabriel Aprati, Senior Associate
Our attorneys argued the real failure was the truck driver, who re-entered live highway traffic from the shoulder of the highway at a dangerously low speed, in violation of state law, industry standards, and accepted practices.
“The defense wanted the jury to believe John Barnes had a choice in those final seconds. We showed them the physics, the standards, the law — and what it actually looks like when a commercial truck re-enters live traffic at a crawl. There was no opportunity to brake. There was only a failure that never should have happened.”
Nicholas Emerson, Senior Associate
The Verdict
On June 23, 2026, a federal jury agreed. The truck driver and trucking company were found liable, and the jury awarded a guilty verdict of $10,025,000.
For the Barnes family, this verdict is about more than a number. It is about answers. It is about accountability. It is about being able to move forward after the loss of their father.
Were You Injured in a Trucking Accident?
Getting the right guidance early can make a difference in how your claim moves forward and how your injuries are documented.
Levin & Perconti has recovered over $2 billion in verdicts and settlements and brings more than 400 years of combined experience to cases involving serious injuries, including trucking accidents in Chicago.
If you or someone you love was injured in a trucking accident, call 312-332-2872, text us at 1(844)781-1274 or fill out our contact form to discuss your situation and learn what options may be available to you.
