Birth Injury Attorney Explains the Hidden Problem with Medical Literature in Birth Injury Cases

What I have learned, discovered over my 45 years of experience is that not all literature and data is reliable, not all of it is objective, and as a result, I have devoted a significant amount of my time doing my own research, studying the literature, reading the textbooks, and.
Exposing articles that I believe represent junk science.
I believe that there is literature that should not be cited in the courtroom, should not receive the same level of respect and reliability as other articles or data.
The problem that families face and the problem that attorneys face when representing them.
Brain-damaged children are that there are articles in literature that are written solely for litigation purposes.
Articles are written just for the purpose of giving another expert an opportunity to say, oh, but I’m familiar with other articles that agree with me.
I believe that we have an obligation, we meaning those of us who are child advocates, those of us.
We who are reviewing the literature want cases to be based upon reliable, valid scientific principles and data to expose, criticize, and challenge any conclusions or any articles that are published that are not well supported and do not objectively consider all of the data, all of the articles.